Certified Texas Contract Manager Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified Texas Contract Manager Exam. Study with practice questions and detailed explanations. Get ready to ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

Which scenario would justify withholding payment?

Temporary delays due to weather
Minor discrepancies in delivered goods
Vendor noncompliance with contract terms
Negotiations for future contracts

The correct answer is: Vendor noncompliance with contract terms

Withholding payment is justified in scenarios where a vendor does not comply with the terms outlined in the contract. This noncompliance can include failure to meet quality standards, delivery schedules, or other specific obligations agreed upon in the contract. When these terms are not fulfilled, it may cause harm or detriment to the buyer, making it reasonable to withhold payment until the issues are resolved or the vendor rectifies their performance according to the contract stipulations. In contrast, temporary delays due to weather typically fall under force majeure circumstances, which are often considered excusable delays. Minor discrepancies in delivered goods may not significantly impact the overall contract fulfillment and are usually addressed through adjustments rather than outright withholding payment. Finally, negotiations for future contracts generally do not affect current contracts and payments, so they do not provide a basis for withholding payment under the existing agreement.